Open Source ERP – the list

We have discussed open source ERP here a few times. Finally, someone has put together a list (although we do not know if it is an exhaustive list) of the main open source ERP Packages.

You can see for yourself here:

Line56.com3A20Free20ERP

Causes of ERP Failures

Here is an article that zooms right into the reasons for why ERP implementations fail:

Causes of ERP Failures
by: Bruce Zhang

ERP is the acronym of Enterprise Resource Planning. Multi-module ERP software integrates business activities across various functional departments, from product planning, parts purchasing, inventory control, product distribution, to order tracking. ERP has transformed the way multi-billion dollar corporations conduct their businesses. Successful implementation of ERP systems could save tens of millions of dollars and increase employee satisfactions, customer satisfactions and sustain competitive advantages in every-changing marketplace. Corporate executives are often perplexed by the stories that how reputable corporations (Hershey Foods) have failed miserably and lost ten of millions of dollars in their ERP endures.

The failures of ERP projects are preventable if we can identify the common causes of the failures regardless the companies and industries that implement them.

An ERP system is the combination of ERP software, the business processes that the ERP transforms, the users of the ERP system, and the computer systems that run the ERP applications. The failures of a ERP project is often the result of the failures in one or more of those four components. The failures in computer systems (hardware and operating systems) are much easier to identify and to fix, so we’ll examine the failures in software implementation, business process and user acceptance.

Failure of ERP Software Implementation

Module-based ERP software is the core of ERP systems. Most ERP projects involve significant amount of customizations. Packaged ERP software modules have built-in functionality that work in a standard and simplified enterprise environment. However, every organization is unique in data requirements and business processes. It is the customizations that transform packaged ERP software into ERP software that meets organizations’ individual business processes and operations. Long and expensive customization efforts often result the pass of release deadline and budget overrun. Customizations may make the software more fragile and harder to maintain when it finally goes to production. Major changes may be required in the later stage of the implementation as a result of incomplete requirements and power struggles within organizations

Why New Systems Fail: An Insider’s Guide to Successful IT Projects

The integration of ERP systems (http://www.sysoptima.com/erp/erp_integration.php) with the IT infrastructures also challenges ERP project teams. The use of appropriate implementation methodologies can often make or break a ERP project. (http://www.sysoptima.com/erp/implementation_methodologies.php)

Failure of Accommodating Evolution of Business Processes

According to Anthony, R. A, business processes fall into three levels – strategic planning, management control and operational control. Organizations continuously realign their business processes of all levels in response to the ever-changing market environment. Many ERP systems aren’t flexible enough to accommodate evolution of business processes. many ERP system need a major overhaul in every a couple of years.

Failure of User Acceptance

The users of ERP systems are employees of the organizations at all levels. ERP projects usually modify the company’s business processes which create extra workload for employees who use them initially. They may not think that the workflow embedded in the software are better than the ones they currently use. Ongoing end-user involvement and training may ease the difficult in organization’s adaptation of new systems and new business processes.

About The Author

Bruce Zhang has over 10 years experiences in developing and implementing ecommerce and ebusiness systems in various industries.

He operates a website http://www.sysoptima.com that automatically aggregates the news and new articles in e-business (ERP, CRM,

Supply Chain Management and Knowledge Management) from over 50 sources daily (http://www.sysoptima.com/newsbot/) to help corporate executives, professionals and consultants to keep up with the latest development in enterprise software market. The website offers a knowledge base for understanding business software from a systems perspective.

ERP Forums

We are pleased to announce our new ERP forums!

We will be adding forums as we go, but for now, there are forums dedicated to ERP, PLM, and CRM.

Please feel free to post your questions, answers, topics of concern, or other related topics. Please keep the discussions professional! We hope that these will become a valuable resource to you. We welcome your contributions to this knowledge base of ERP, CRM, and PLM information.

You can view them by going to Our ERP Forums

Blackberry goes ERP

Now that everyone is breathing a sigh of relief after RIM’s legal settlement:
Blackberry goes ERP
by Cliff Saran
Tuesday 7 March 2006

Research in Motion has given its Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) support for web services to enable wireless access to enterprise systems such as SAP.

The company’s aim with the 4.1 release of BES is to move Blackberry beyond push e-mail. It has introduced a development tool called MDS 4.1 to help businesses create links…Blackberry goes ERP

New ERP Bookstore

In association with Amazon.com, ERPandmore.com now has a complete bookstore to assist you in finding ERP, CRM, PLM, or other software/process books. To access this new store, please click on “books” at the top right of the page. We hope you find this to be a valuable part of the site.

Adding Value to ERP

During the 1990s, the vast majority of Global 2000 companies deployed client/server systems for enterprise resource planning (ERP) to replace their mainframe-based accounting packages. Some did it as part of the business process re-engineering (BPR) boom, others as Y2K upgrades at the end of the decade and others simply to replace aging financial systems. A recurring theme throughout the ’90s was that implementing ERP was difficult, expensive and frustrating. Study after study showed substandard returns for ERP investments. Perhaps because of this experience, many organizations have been very cautious about making changes to their ERP environments. However, doing nothing may be a costly mistake because most companies can use their ERP software more effectively than they are doing today.
Intelligent Enterprise Magazine: Adding Value to ERP

AMR Research: IT Executives Expect Double-Digit Increase on ERP in 2006

We knew it all along:

IT Executives Expect Double-Digit Increase on ERP in 2006

AMR Research: IT Executives Expect Double-Digit Increase on ERP in 2006

ERP is in the picture for midsize manufacturers

Small and midsize manufacturers are increasing IT investment because they don’t have the IT architecture needed to compete in a demand-driven world. For many, this means going back to the basics: an ERP system that standardizes business processes, extends the company’s reach, and reduces overhead.

In a 2005 study of more than 550 companies’ ERP investment plans, only 27 percent of small companies “those with fewer than 500 employees” currently …more… (requires registration)